Welcoming Remarks - Ministry of Communications (DepHub), Director
General of Post and Telecommunications & USAID

 
Keynotes on International Best Practice
in Public Access

August 27, 2003

Christopher Light, Senior Program Officer, AED
Michael Tetelman, Senior Program Officer, AED

 

The DOT-COM Alliance
 
Digital Opportunities through Technology and Communication (DOT-COM) – funded by USAID

An Alliance of:
  dot-GOV (Internews)
  dot-ORG (Academy for Educational Development)
  dot-EDU (Education Development Center)

 
Best Practice with Community Teleservice Centers
 
Illustrative Models
 
India
:
Entrepreneur-owned kiosk approach
Rwanda
:
Entrepreneur-owned traditional telecenter approach
Paraguay
:
Public sector approach
Summary – some lessons learned and potential applicability for Indonesia’s CTCs?
 
 
India: N-logue Telecenter Model
 
Rural-only focus.
Each site should service a 25 km sq. area.
Low equipment cost (+/- $1,000/site)
Equipment consists of PC with multimedia/Webcam, equipment to connect to Internet, UPS, and local
  application software.
Uses corDECT WLL technology.
Share bandwidth revenues but bulk of revenue stays with kiosk operator.
Once connected, focus on services and content.
700 villages connected.
 
 
Rwanda: Community Internet Centers
 
Challenges to successful implementation
Design strategies include:
Focus on populations between 20,000-40,000 people and no reliable ICT access points prior to project
  implementation
Competitive tender that required detailed business plans
Working with experienced IT entrepreneurs
High-up front investment by the operators
Use of vouchers to stimulate demand
“Hybrid” approach of social development and for-profit ICT access and services
 
Rwanda: Community Internet Centers
 
Most Popular Services
IT Training (mainly students), basic ICTs (Internet browsing, email, photocopying)
Value-Added Services
Supporting distance education and local justice process (community court proceedings)
Multi-media presentations: e.g. opening adjacent “movie theater”
Some early lessons from the project
Value of setting up CICs in areas with extensive NGO and school/university network
Working closely with telecom companies to get acceptable bandwidth
Challenges of reliable electricity
Developing association of CICs for lobbying
 
 
Paraguay: Community Learning Centers
 
Overview
Project supported by municipality in Asuncion and centers (12) installed in schools and municipal buildings
“Hybrid” approach
11 centers still operational, though only 2-3 are thriving (municipal subsidies still supporting most of the
centers)
Lessons learned from divergent outcomes
Leadership is critical: strategic use of management committees (e.g. need for member turnover)
Long term planning/community involvement focus and acceptance of continued reliance on municipal
subsidies to achieve outcome
Build on unexpected success of first center to catalyze remaining centers
Problems of starting with free services and moving to fee for use
Strategic partnerships (e.g. with ISPs)
 
 
Summary – Some Potential Lessons for Indonesia?
 
Up-front investment by telecenter operator
Feasibility studies prior to site selection and implementation
Technical and cost issues relating to connectivity
Value of a “hybrid model”: for-profit orientation mixed with social development
Need for value-added content to go beyond access and training
Gender sensitive approaches: e.g. women as trainers and managers
Effective management staff
Telecenter operators and local project managers
 
 
Further Information
 
Website: www.dot-com-alliance.org
Contacts:
  Christopher Light
  Academy for Educational Development
  clight@aed.org
   
  Michael Tetelman
  Academy for Educational Development
  mtetelma@aed.org